Members of Parliament (MPs) from the Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF) could face disciplinary action following their disruptive conduct during President Cyril Ramaphosa’s question-and-answer session in the National Assembly on Tuesday.
Deputy Speaker Annelie Lotriet confirmed that she would refer the matter to Speaker Thoko Didiza for a decision on whether the MPs should face a disciplinary hearing. The EFF members were ejected from the session after repeatedly raising points of order, causing significant disruptions.
Disciplinary Process Underway
Lotriet stated that she would submit a report to Didiza, recommending that the MPs be referred to the Powers and Privileges Committee, which handles parliamentary misconduct. “I will recommend that the speaker considers whether these members should not be referred to the committee,” Lotriet said.
Approximately 10 EFF MPs—both physically present and on the virtual platform—were involved in the disruptions. If found guilty, they could face sanctions ranging from a reprimand to suspension without salary, as per parliamentary rules.
What Sparked the Chaos?
The disruptions began when an EFF MP refused to stop speaking after their allotted time expired, disregarding the Deputy Speaker’s instructions. This was followed by a series of what Lotriet described as “spurious points of order,” which derailed proceedings.
Adding to the tension, two presidential bodyguards were present in the chamber—an issue Lotriet acknowledged as problematic but attributed to logistical challenges due to Parliament operating from the smaller Good Hope Chamber since the 2022 fire.
Public Trust in Parliament at Stake
Lotriet expressed concern over the impact of such behavior on public perception of Parliament. “This is a disservice to the people of South Africa,” she said. “We are representatives of the voters, and this kind of conduct undermines respect for the institution.”
President Ramaphosa also voiced frustration, stating that he felt “abused” by the disruptions, which prevented other MPs from posing critical questions.
EFF Accuses Deputy Speaker of Bias
EFF leader Julius Malema, participating virtually, suggested that Lotriet was not impartial in her rulings. However, Lotriet dismissed the claim, stating, “Bias is in the eye of the beholder. I acted according to the rules.”
What Happens Next?
The matter now rests with Speaker Didiza, who will decide whether to proceed with disciplinary action. If referred to the Powers and Privileges Committee, the EFF MPs could face penalties similar to past sanctions, including salary deductions.
As Parliament grapples with maintaining decorum, the incident raises broader questions about political accountability and the integrity of South Africa’s legislative processes.