In a little under a month, the amendments proposed last year by the Private Security Industry Regulatory Authority (PSIRA) are due to be enforced. While much valid discontent has already been shared by fellow peers and other stakeholders, we must applaud the motion to strengthen accountability, professionalism and address industry-specific challenges through legislation.
The formation of the proposal by the regulatory authority is proof of the awareness of the deficiencies that have prevailed in the industry for far too long.
While law-abiding private security companies financially invested heavily to comply with regulatory requirements, such as organisational and personnel registration and training, rogue fly-by-night companies have discredited our industry and must be brought to book.
Several articles in the past have relayed shocking stories of security companies alleged to belong to unscrupulous characters who weaponised their companies as an extension of themselves to roll out vigilante justice, support taxi wars and even downright theft.
It is well documented that our sector employs a considerable number of people. The security industry has expanded at a rapid rate over the past two decades, and with this growth comes inconsistency with compliance. The sheer amount of chess pieces in our industry calls for a more stringent hand of control so that there is oversight of all activities within the companies, and that these activities adhere to the constitution of our country. Security personnel must be held accountable, in particular for their usage or loss of firearms.
The amendments also place the security personnel at the centre, requiring annual psychological evaluation. For too long, the industry has focused on the business aspect of balance sheets and income statements when those on the ground face danger on a daily basis. Such a proposal aims to check that not only are the personnel supported, but that harm is minimised to those closest to them should their line of work or personal traumas adversely affect them.
While I applaud the intention behind PSIRA’s proposal, I, too, am wary about some points opposed by others, such as the restriction of weapons in public spaces and the cost implications of many of the suggestions, which in turn would likely bleed onto customers, who are already buckling under economic pressures.
Amendments must be based on the reality of the crime in South Africa, especially the rise of organised crime.
However, instead of a complete overhaul of the amendments, I believe that as industry players, we must put our heads together to reach a consensus that adheres to the law, ensures public confidence yet also does not leave our guards like sitting ducks.
