High Court Rules Hlengani Mathebula NSFAS Appointment Unlawful Amid Deepening Student Funding Crisis

Public Protector Kholeka Gcaleka and higher education experts warn that systemic mismanagement, leadership failures, and a 10 billion rand payment backlog are actively infringing on students' constitutional rights.

JOHANNESBURG, Gauteng — The NSFAS funding crisis has reached a critical juncture after the High Court ruled that Higher Education Minister Buti Manamela’s appointment of Hlengani Mathebula as the scheme’s administrator was unlawful. This legal setback compounds recent findings from Public Protector Kholeka Gcaleka, who declared that the student financial aid system is structurally failing South African youth and violating their constitutional right to accessible higher education.

The financial strain on the tertiary sector is mounting, with reports confirming that the National Student Financial Aid Scheme has withheld approximately 10 billion rand from universities. Institutions are now grappling with severe cash flow shortages. According to Professor Siseko Kumalo, an Associate Professor of Higher Education at the University of Johannesburg, the situation is fundamentally a “mess” driven by a persistent refusal to act on past corrective measures.

Prof. Kumalo emphasized that the Department of Higher Education and Training (DHET) has consistently neglected remedial recommendations from previous task teams. While Minister Manamela inherited a ministry that had recently seen leadership upheaval—following his predecessor’s removal over irregular SITA board appointments—experts argue he failed to heed those historical warnings. By proceeding with the irregular appointment of Hlengani Mathebula to stabilize the agency, the minister bypassed crucial legal counsel from both ministry advisers and his ministerial advisory committee.

The unlawful administrative appointment follows a highly controversial decision by the minister to dissolve the NSFAS board. At the time, the board accused the minister of irregular conduct and considered legal action, though the challenge was never formalized. Furthermore, the minister notably failed to appear before the parliamentary portfolio committee on the very day the board was dissolved, leaving a vacuum of accountability.

The Public Protector’s report makes it clear that the dysfunction is not isolated to the funding agency alone. It is a tripartite failure involving NSFAS, the overseeing ministry, and the universities themselves. Currently, third-party agents and management companies have absorbed an estimated 500 million rand over recent years just to handle the allocation process. While cutting out these middlemen by allowing the DHET to disburse funds directly to universities seems like a logical fix, Prof. Kumalo warns of significant institutional risks.

Direct funding requires robust institutional governance, which is not universally present. Prof. Kumalo pointed out that allocating massive budgets to universities with known procurement, financial, and reporting vulnerabilities could lead to further mismanagement. Given the history of corruption and the dismissal of chief financial officers at various campuses, any streamlined payment model must be accompanied by strict coordination between the National Treasury, the DHET, and university leadership to ensure financial capacity and ring-fenced spending.

The administrative paralysis has severe real-world consequences. Public Protector Kholeka Gcaleka noted that the current funding model actively infringes on student rights. When stipends are delayed, students face eviction from accommodations and food insecurity. Even those who manage to persevere and complete their studies often find their official degree certificates withheld by universities due to unpaid institutional debts caused by NSFAS delays, though some institutions do release unofficial transcripts.

This bureaucratic bottleneck creates a formidable barrier to job market entry, directly exacerbating South Africa’s unemployment crisis. Prof. Kumalo highlighted the broader macroeconomic danger: when graduates cannot secure employment, they remain dependent on social grants. This dynamic shrinks the active tax-contributing population while simultaneously inflating the state’s social provisioning budget, creating a destructive cycle born from the failure to administer a single critical institution effectively.

 

Related Articles

Latest Articles